Беседа:Цветко Христов

This photo, with the outline that you didn't bother to cut is my property. You have no right to use it, nor did you ask for permision! If you do not take it down, I'd be forced to take further messures. Tanks for your time. --Предният неподписан коментар е направен от анонимен потребител с адрес 77.28.165.108 (беседа • приноси) .

Prove it --Uroboros ^беседа 19:51, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

I have the hard copy. I can prove it, and I will, if you insist on it, but it will go higher than you. A lot higher.--Предният неподписан коментар е направен от D4 (беседа • приноси) .

Not here. This is a problem of Wikimedia Commons. This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity. --Uroboros ^беседа 20:03, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

This picture is taken by the Almanach Macedonia, page 463. If you have any questions or claims about the copyrights, please contact with the authors or publisher of Almanach Macedonia.--Ilikeliljon 20:08, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

This is true about the original photo. And I welcome you to try and find one. But, the photo that you are using is a photograph of a photograph. The colored outline actualy is a carpet and it was made by me. So, you stole it, probabley from my blog, without asking. I am asking you politely to take it down and find another copy that you can use.

No, this photo is taken personaly by me. You forgot to take out the carpeting, and again, I have the hard copy at home to prove it.--Предният неподписан коментар е направен от D4 (беседа • приноси) .

Here is the discussion of picture in Wikimedia Commons. Write your claims there, that`s all.--Ilikeliljon 20:22, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

„No, this photo is taken personaly by me“ - when? in 1903? nonsense!!!!!!!!!!!! --Uroboros ^беседа 20:28, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

It was digitalized by taken a photo of the photo. You cannot use my work without permision. At the very least, the carpet outline makes it an original work of art that you stole from my blog. How can you deny this?--Предният неподписан коментар е направен от D4 (беседа • приноси) .

I`m sorry for misunderstanding, I think that we talk for the picture in bio info template, not for the other picture where we see the three men. However, write on the discussion of the picture in Wikimedia Commons--Ilikeliljon 20:41, 23 април 2010 (UTC)

We are talking about the photo with the 3 men. The one you took from me, without asking. And, by the way, your info is also wrong. These men are not related to Jovan Koteski.--Предният неподписан коментар е направен от D4 (беседа • приноси) .

Thank you, image and info have been edited. --Подпоручикъ 07:48, 24 април 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. One more thing. Jasna Koteska's personal blog is not the one listed under no.5, but in fact: http://jasnakoteska.blogspot.com Please correct this.

The idea of quoting is to give exact reference where readers can find the original information for any state. Is it acceptable the way i edited it? --Подпоручикъ 22:53, 24 април 2010 (UTC)

P.S. Are those related to Jasna Koteska instead of Jovan? If not we have to remove this sentence also. --Подпоручикъ 23:41, 24 април 2010 (UTC)

The blog you have linked under number 5 is my personal blog, not Jasna's. And think about it, Jasna is Jovan's daughter. If he is not related to them, how can she? She is not related to them. You should delete the sentence.

This is a thing i realize, she could be related by her mother's family branch - but it seems she is not. thank you. --Подпоручикъ 14:53, 25 април 2010 (UTC)